If you’ve got your eye on a budget phone in 2025, you’ve probably come across the Unisoc T7250 or the Snapdragon 680. These two chips can both be found in the same space—affordable smartphones under ₦200,000 ($100–$130). But which one’s really worth your money? Let’s find out in this Unisoc T7250 vs Snapdragon 680 side-by-side comparison.
The Unisoc T7250 is a budget SoC that was announced in 2024. It is a rebranded version of the older Unisoc T615, which itself was a minor refresh of the T610. So really, this chip is part of a long-running Unisoc design that’s been stretched out over the years. It doesn’t bring anything new to the table, but it does offer decent performance for everyday tasks. Phones from Itel, Doogee, Blackview, and other budget brands have started adopting the T7250 in 2025.
The Snapdragon 680 is also a budget SoC, launched by Qualcomm in late 2021. It was built to replace the Snapdragon 662 and 665, and while it uses a modern 6nm process, the CPU architecture is actually dated. It still relies on Cortex-A73 and A53 cores, which were already showing their age by 2021. The Snapdragon 680 is still found in many 2023 and early 2024 phones, like the Redmi Note 11, Redmi 10c, Samsung Galaxy A05s, and Motorola G32. It has since been succeeded by the Snapdragon 685.
📊 Unisoc T7250 vs Snapdragon 680 Specifications
| Feature | Unisoc T7250 | Snapdragon 680 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU |
|
|
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 @850MHz | Adreno 610 @1114MHz |
| Process | 12nm (TSMC) | 6nm (TSMC) |
| RAM | LPDDR4X @1866MHz | LPDDR4X @2133MHz |
| Storage | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 |
| Display | Up to 1080p | Up to 1080p |
| Cameras | 108MP | 108MP |
| Connectivity | 4G LTE, Wi-Fi 5, BT 5.0 | 4G LTE, Wi-Fi 5, BT 5.0 |
🧠 CPU Performance
On paper, both chips are pretty close, but there’s a twist. The Snapdragon 680 has the older CPU cores (Cortex-A73 and A53) which are older and less efficient than the Cortex-A75 and A55 combo in the T7250. However, the Snapdragon has 2 extra big cores and it much faster (2.4GHz on its A73 cores) than the Unisoc T7250. As a result, the Snapdragon 680 feels snappier in real-world use, especially in multitasking and app switching.
Please note that the difference isn’t huge, but it’s enough to be noticed in daily use.
✅ Winner: Snapdragon 680
🎮 GPU & Gaming
The Adreno 610 in the Snapdragon 680 is more stable, better supported, and generally performs more consistently in games. Titles like Free Fire, Asphalt 9, and Call of Duty Mobile run better on the Snapdragon 680—even if only just.
The Mali-G57 MP1 in the T7250 looks newer on paper, but it’s not significantly more powerful, and Unisoc’s GPU optimization is still sketchy.
✅ Winner: Snapdragon 680
📈 Benchmark Scores (AnTuTu v10 & Geekbench 6)
| Benchmark | Unisoc T7250 | Snapdragon 680 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu v10 | 263913 | 308111 |
| Geekbench 6 SC/MC | 441/1454 | 412/1444 |
In benchmarks, the Snapdragon 680 clearly wins on AnTuTu 10 but both SoCs are tied when it comes to raw CPU performance. The Snapdragon 680 has a better GPU and better total system performance.
✅ Winner: Snapdragon 680 (overall score)
💾 RAM and Storage
Both SoCs support LPDDR4X RAM and UFS 2.2 storage. In practice, this means similar app launch speeds and multitasking capability. However, the RAM on the Snapdragon 680 is slightly faster. Something to keep in mind.
🤝 Tie
📸 Camera Support
Both SoCs supports up to 108MP on paper, but theory is one thing—real-world is another. Camera/video performance depends more on the ISP (Image Signal Processor), software tuning and the image sensor used. In that regard, Qualcomm’s Spectra ISP is much more mature. You’re more likely to get cleaner photos and better HDR on a Snapdragon 680-powered phone.
✅ Winner: Snapdragon 680
📶 Connectivity
No 5G here—both chips are 4G-only and come with Wi-Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.0. Dual SIM LTE is supported on both.
Nothing much to separate them.
🤝 Tie
🔋 Battery Efficiency
Now this one’s tricky. Even though the Snapdragon 680 is fabbed on 6nm, it uses older CPU cores that tend to draw more power when stressed.
The Unisoc T7250, built on 12nm, seems like it would be less efficient—but in practice, the newer A55 efficiency cores help keep it cool and power-conscious. So battery life is actually quite close on both, depending on the phone’s software and battery size.
⚖️ Slight Edge: Snapdragon 680 (thanks to 6nm)
💸 Price & Availability
Here’s the real catch. The Snapdragon 680 is in dozens of popular phones—Redmi Note 11, Galaxy A05s, Moto G32, etc. These are often well-built, well-supported phones with better displays, cameras, and software. They are also more expensive.
The Unisoc T7250 is found in lesser-known brands like Itel, Doogee, and Blackview. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but you’re trading polish for raw performance. These are usually more affordable.
✅ Winner: Snapdragon 680 (more reliable ecosystem)
🏁 Unisoc T7250 vs Snapdragon 680 Final Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| CPU Performance | Snapdragon 680 |
| GPU & Gaming | Snapdragon 680 |
| RAM & Storage | Tie |
| Camera | Snapdragon 680 |
| Battery Efficiency | Snapdragon 680 |
| Software Ecosystem | Snapdragon 680 |
| Overall Performance | Snapdragon 680 |
🔥 TL;DR:
- The Snapdragon 680 is the better SoC.
- Go with it if you want better CPU performance and snappier multitasking, gaming, camera output, and brand trust.
The Unisoc T7250 punches slightly above its weight, as long as you’re okay buying from lesser-known brands.
Please leave a comment if you found this helpful and remember to:
- Subscribe to our YouTube channel
- Follow on Facebook
- Follow on WhatsApp
- Join our Telegram community
- Participate on Reddit
- Find us on Quora