In recent years, Unisoc has made a name for itself in the entry-level and budget segments by offering processors that deliver basic performance at aggressive prices. But alongside its push into this market, a curious trend has emerged — rebranding. The Unisoc T7250 vs Unisoc T7255 are the latest examples of this tactic, and while the names are slightly different, the SoCs themselves are very similar.
This article pits these two Tiger-series SoCs against each other to ask the important question: what’s the real difference, and why should we care?
- Unisoc Tiger T7250 is a rebranded Unisoc T615, announced in 2024.
- Unisoc Tiger T7255 is also a rebranded Unisoc T616, also unveiled in 2024.
Both chips belong to the budget SoC tier, utilizing ARMv8 cores built on TSMC’s 12nm process. They are designed for affordable smartphones, often found in entry-level Android phones priced under $120.
You may also be interested in:
- Unisoc T7255 – A rebranded T616
- Unisoc T7250 – Still another rebrand
- Unisoc T7225 – Another Unisoc Rebrand
- Unisoc T7200 -Spoiler! It’s not a new SoC
- Unisoc T603: Just a rebranded SC9863A
- UNISOC
- MediaTek Helio G85 vs Unisoc T606: Which SoC is better?
Unisoc T7250 vs Unidoc T7255 Specifications Breakdown
| Feature | Unisoc T7250 | Unisoc T7255 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 2x Cortex A75 (1.8GHz)
6x Cortex A55 (1.6GHz) |
2x Cortex A75 (2.0GHz)
6x Cortex A55 (1.8GHz) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 (850MHz) | Mali-G57 MP1 (850MHz) |
| RAM | LPDDR4X (1866MHz) | LPDDR4X (1866MHz) |
| Storage | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Display | 720p@120Hz or 1080p@60Hz | 1080p@60Hz |
| Camera Support | Up to 108MP | Up to 108MP |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 1080p@60fps |
| Modem | 4G LTE Cat.7 + VoLTE | 4G LTE Cat.7 + VoLTE |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
Performance: Slightly Tuned, Same Class
In terms of raw performance, both SoCs rely on the same 2+6 CPU configuration: two Cortex A75 performance cores and six Cortex A55 efficiency cores.
However, the T7255 runs at slightly higher clock speeds — 2.0GHz to the 1.8GHz on the A75s and 1.8GHz to the 1.6GHz on the A55s. This gives the T7255 a small edge in synthetic benchmarks and CPU responsiveness.
The GPU is the same Mali-G57 MP1 running at the same frequency, so graphics and gaming performance are identical. Expect light gaming and smooth UI animations, but nothing more demanding.
Both chips also support LPDDR4X RAM at 1866MHz and UFS 2.2 storage, which ensures solid multitasking and fast app loading in budget phones. No difference here.
Verdict: The T7255 is marginally faster, but not significantly so. This is more of a “binning” difference than a true generational leap.
Display and Visual Output
The T7250 supports both 720p at 120Hz and 1080p at 60Hz, while the T7255 is locked at 1080p@60Hz. While this seems like a win for the T7250 on paper, the GPU isn’t powerful enough to fully exploit 120Hz displays — it’s more of a marketing checkbox than a real-world benefit.
Both SoCs will comfortably support Full HD panels, which is what truly matters in this segment.
Verdict: Display support is functionally similar in practice.
Camera and Video
Both chips advertise support for 108MP sensors, although phones using these SoCs typically ship with 13MP or 50MP cameras due to cost constraints. The Image Signal Processors (ISP) are essentially unchanged between the two SoCs, meaning real-world camera output will depend more on software optimization than hardware.
Video encoding and decoding max out at 1080p@60fps for both, which is adequate for this class.
Verdict: No meaningful difference.
Connectivity
Both SoCs support 4G LTE Cat.7 and VoLTE, providing reliable connectivity for calls and mobile internet. Neither supports 5G — understandable given their budget positioning.
The T7250 uses Bluetooth 5.2, while the T7255 sticks to Bluetooth 5.0. This is a very minor win for the T7250, offering potentially better power efficiency and slightly improved data rates.
Wi-Fi 5 is the standard for both, supporting 802.11ac for decent wireless speeds.
Verdict: Connectivity is virtually identical, though the T7250 edges ahead with Bluetooth 5.2.
So… Why Do These Chips Exist Separately?
Here’s where the bigger question lies: what’s the point of having both the T7250 and T7255?
The answer lies in branding, marketing flexibility, and supply chain management. By tweaking clock speeds slightly, Unisoc can:
- Create multiple SKUs for OEMs to choose from.
- Reuse old silicon with minimal R&D costs.
- Keep up the illusion of innovation by introducing “new” chips.
- Appeal to procurement departments of phone makers with specific performance or cost targets.
It’s a way to stretch old designs across several model years and price points without much real effort.
Conclusion
The Unisoc T7250 and T7255 are nearly identical in architecture, performance, and feature set. The T7255 offers slightly higher CPU clock speeds, while the T7250 gives you Bluetooth 5.2 and optional 120Hz support for 720p displays. Beyond that, there is very little that separates them.
If you’re shopping for a phone, either SoC will serve you equally well for basic tasks — messaging, streaming, browsing, and light gaming.
Ultimately, these two chips are different names for the same thing. The only real difference? The name on the box.
Please leave a comment if you found this helpful and remember to:
- Subscribe to our YouTube channel
- Follow on Facebook
- Follow on WhatsApp
- Join our Telegram community
- Participate on Reddit
- Find us on Quora