With Samsung’s return to the midrange segment, it will be interesting to see how well they will perform against the competition. To examine this, we are going to be putting up one of Samsung’s midrange offerings against one of MediaTek’s. This is the Dimensity 7200 vs. Exynos 1380.
The Dimensity 7200 is a relatively new SoC from MediaTek. It was announced in February 2023 and it is billed as a midrange SoC. The Dimensity 7200 has not been widely adopted by many smartphone makers. However, it can be found on phones like the Vivo V27, Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro, Vivo S17e, Vivo T2 Pro 5G, and the Redmi Note 13 Pro+.
The Exynos 1380 is also an upper midrange SoC from Samsung. It is meant exclusively for Samsung Galaxy A series devices. It was announced in the same month as the Dimensity 7200 and has made its debut on the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, F54, and M54.
With that being said, let us dive into this comparison and see which SoC is the better one.
Dimensity 7200 vs. Exynos 1380 Specifications
Dimensity 7200 | Exynos 1380 | |
| Class | Upper Midrange | Upper Midrange |
| Model Number | MT6886 | S5E8835 |
| Big Cores | 2x Cortex-A715 (2.8GHz) | 4x Cortex A78 (2.4GHz) |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cores | 6x Cortex-A510 (2.0GHz) | 4x Cortex A55 (2.0GHz) |
| Clock Speed | 2.8GHz | 2.4GHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2 | ARMv8 |
| L1 Cache | 512KB | – |
| L2 Cache | 1MB | – |
| L3 Cache | 4MB | – |
| Process Node | 4nm TSMC | 5nm Samsung EUV |
| TDP | 5W | 5W |
| GPU Name | ARM Mali G610 MP4 | ARM Mali G68 MP5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Max Frequency | 1130MHz | 950MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 5 |
| RAM | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Speed | 3200MHz | 3200MHz |
| Max RAM Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM Size | 16 GB | 8GB |
| Storage | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max Display Resolution | 2520 x 1080 | FHD+ |
|---|---|---|
| Max Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 144Hz |
| HDR | Yes | – |
| Video Capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K @30fps |
| Video Playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K @30fps |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| 4G Support | Yes, Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 18 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G Support | Yes, Up to 4700 Mbps | 5G NR Sub-6GHz 3.79Gbps (DL) / 1.28 Gbps (UL)5G NR mmWave 3.67Gbps (DL) / 0.92 Gbps (UL) |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GNSS, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo |
| NFC | Yes | – |
| Max Camera Lens | 200MP | 200MP |
|---|
Performance: Dimensity 7200 vs. Exynos 1380
For CPU performance, the Dimensity 7200 flexes its muscles with 2 Cortex A715 (2.8GHz) CPUs for demanding tasks and 6 Cortex A510 (2.0GHz) CPUs for lighter workloads. For the Exynos 1380, there are 4 Cortex A78 (2.4GHz) for heavy CPU tasks and 4 Cortex A55 CPU cores for battery efficiency.
With these specs like this, it is clear that the Dimensity 7200 has the better performance. Its A715 CPU cores are faster and more powerful than the A78 cores in the Exynos 1380, although you should note that the gap between them isn’t all that wide.
Benchmarks
To confirm if our analysis is correct, let’s look at Benchmarks. Benchmarks are tests that examine SoCs using tests that mimic real-life performance. They help to give us a general idea of how well an SoC should behave. The Dimensity 7200 scores are on the left and those of the Exynos 1380 are on the right.
AnTuTu
| CPU | 243,264 | 155,921 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | 178,796 | 148,262 |
| Memory | 130,142 | 85,150 |
| UX | 160,908 | 126,072 |
| Total Score | 713,398 | 517,295 |
GeekBench
| Single-Core | 1196 | 784 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 2651 | 2623 |
Gaming: Dimensity 7200 vs. Exynos 1380
For graphics and gaming, the Dimensity 7200 wins because it has the superior GPU. The Mali G610 MP4 on the Dimensity 7200 outshines the Mali G68 MP5 on the Exynos 1380. This category is a clear win for the Dimensity 7200.
RAM and Storage
Both SoCs are tied in this department. This is because they both use the same LPDDR5 (3200MHz) RAM and support up to UFS 3.1 storage.
Cameras and Video
This story repeats itself for camera and video. Both SoCs support cameras with resolutions of up to 200MP and can handle recording/playback of 4K videos at 60fps. Image processing output is also quite similar, but the Exynos places a bit more emphasis on image/video processing, while the Dimensity focuses more on raw performance.
Connectivity
For network connectivity, both SoCs cover the full range from 2G to 5G networks, include Bluetooth 5.3, and support WiFi 6. However, the Dimensity 7200 takes the lead in upload and download speeds with 4G and 5G.
Battery
When it comes to battery consumption and heat generation, the Dimensity 7200 is more gentle on the battery and produces less heat. This advantage stems from its more efficient 4nm TSMC process. The Exynos 1380 trails slightly behind with its 5nm Samsung process.
Conclusion
In this comparison, the Dimensity 7200 offers the better performance, gaming, connectivity, and battery efficiency. The Exynos 1380 may have a slight edge in camera support, but it might not be enough to sway many users. To establish a stronger foothold in the midrange market, Samsung needs to bring more to the table.
Please leave a comment if you have any difficulty and remember to:
- Subscribe to our YouTube channel
- Follow on Facebook
- Join our Telegram community
- Participate on Reddit
- Find us on Quora
- Follow us on Instagram